Mo. leaders challenge open letter
issued by breakaway institutions
May 17, 2002
By Don Hinkle
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (BP)--Missouri Baptist
Convention leaders are challenging the veracity of an open letter from
leaders of five Missouri Baptist institutions where trustee boards have
voted to become self-perpetuating rather than seating trustees elected
by MBC churches.
The open letter, printed in the May 2 Word & Way newsjournal and
distributed to Baptists statewide, attempts to debunk the legal opinions
of three law firms hired by the convention to determine if the trustee
actions were in violation of Missouri corporate law.
In separate opinions, the three firms reported that the five trustee
boards acted illegally in amending their institutions' charters so the
trustees could elect their own successors. The disputed trustee actions
eliminated input from MBC churches that have given millions of dollars
to the entities -- now said to be worth nearly $100 million combined.
With an attorney representing trustees of one entity threatening legal
action over $400,000 in escrowed funds previously earmarked for the
entity, the legal maneuvering could be a precursor to a test case in the
courts, a development that would likely raise eyebrows in other state
conventions that have seen trustee boards, particularly at Southern
Baptist colleges, become self-perpetuating as well.
Michael Whitehead, legal adviser to the MBC executive board's legal
opinion task force, in a written summary in April of the three law
firms' findings, concluded, "The [Missouri trustee boards' charter]
amendments contained false statements ..." and "individual
trustees and agency officials may have personal liability for actual and
punitive damages. Legal theories could include breach of fiduciary duty,
breach of contract, misrepresentation, civil conspiracy,
misappropriation or conversion of assets."
Whitehead is among those in the MBC expressing dismay recently over
statements made in the open letter from the heads of Missouri Baptist
College, Windermere Baptist Conference Center, the Missouri Baptist
Foundation, The Baptist Home and Word & Way. He took particular
exception to the letter's claim that MBC leaders "chose not to meet
with any of the institutions prior to making their report (the legal
opinions) public."
Whitehead, in a May 17 press release to Baptist Press, called the
statement "simply untrue."
"We sent the agencies the report the last week of March, before the
executive board had even seen it. The report was released to the Baptist
public after the executive board received the report on April 9,"
Whitehead said.
Bob Curtis, MBC president and pastor of Ballwin Baptist Church, Ballwin,
noted that the institutions' presidents and their chairmen canceled
meetings to discuss convention concerns, scheduled for April 1-2.
Randy Fullerton, chairman of the board of trustees for Missouri Baptist
College, acknowledged in the May 16 edition of Word & Way that
entity heads and board chairmen canceled because they did not have time
to meet with trustees and their attorneys between the time they received
the MBC legal opinion (March 27) and the dates set for the meeting. Both
sides reiterated a willingness to meet while attending the MBC executive
board meeting April 8-9.
Meanwhile, David Tolliver, MBC recording secretary, a member of the MBC
legal task force, and senior pastor of Pisgah Baptist Church in
Excelsior Springs, said in a letter to the editor submitted to the Word
& Way but not published that he was "appalled" that the
institutions' heads claimed to have sought to work with officers of the
MBC in an effort to find a solution to the controversy. The leaders also
claim to have held "numerous" meetings with convention
leadership over the last 18 months to discuss the issues involved,
according to their open letter.
"Let me state for the record," Tolliver writes in his letter,
"that I am a convention officer, as well as a member of the legal
issues subcommittee, and therefore a part of convention leadership --
yet, I have never met with anyone from any of the renegade institutions
and they are not trying to work with me. Let me also state that I am
willing to meet with them, at any time and anywhere, to try to bring
about biblical restoration."
Tolliver also challenged the institutions' claims that the MBC executive
board refused to meet with them prior to publishing and distributing the
legal opinion.
"The truth is that meetings with all five institutions were set up
(for April 1-2)," he wrote. "But, at the last minute, the
institutions canceled those meetings."
Curtis affirmed Whitehead's and Tolliver's views in an interview
published May 16 in Word & Way.
"The truth of the matter is that Dr. Gary Taylor, chairman of the
legal opinion task force, and I wrote to each agency president in early
March requesting a time to sit down together with them, brother to
brother, without legal counsel present, to discuss the issues before us.
They all agreed to meet," Curtis said, noting that they later
canceled and have yet to confirm a new date.
Curtis voiced a concern that the Word & Way has been unfair in its
coverage of the controversy. His dismay with the paper stems from an
open letter he wrote for Missouri Southern Baptists that was not
published. The letter was written as a response to the open letter by
the five entity heads. Rather than publish the letter, Word & Way
used portions of it in a front-page news article.
"I called Bill Webb (Word & Way editor) and asked why an open
letter from the president of the MBC, elected by the people, was not
published in full. I told him Missouri Baptists have a right to hear
from their president."
Curtis said Webb cited the length of the letter and the possibility of
some of the meetings discussed in the letter being subject to
interpretation as reasons for not publishing it in full. Webb, on May
17, told Baptist Press that, with the ongoing exchange of opinions,
"a better way, from our perspective, was to do a news story"
to bring together both sides of the issue and "to certainly give
him an opportunity to state his concerns."
"So," Curtis told Baptist Press, "you have the editor of
this paper deciding what Southern Baptists in Missouri should and should
not hear from their president. He had no problem publishing the open
letter from the heads of the five entities in its entirety, but of
course, he's one of them."
Curtis said Word & Way's article on his open letter made it appear
that "all we did was make legal demands." He said the portion
of his letter that makes that clear was not published.
"Both Gary [Taylor] and I spent the Easter weekend making calls to
the presidents of each agency, sharing with them that, as the letter
said, 'We want to hear from you about what you believe is necessary in
order for the parties to reconcile.' When it became apparent that the
agency leaders were not going to meet, we then sent another letter dated
April 2, with the following first paragraph, 'Due to our inability to
meet April 1 and 2, and apologizing for any offense and
misunderstandings concerning the letter dated March 26, we are making
another attempt to meet with you as Christian brothers.'"
Curtis, in his open letter, noted, "I want to assure Missouri
Baptists that we are committed to biblical reconciliation and
restoration. I also want to assure Missouri Baptists that we will
continue to move this process along in order to bring closure to this
issue."
Curtis' entire letter is being mailed to churches and directors of
missions throughout the state and to members of the MBC executive board.
It also is to be posted at the MBC's website, www.mobaptist.org.
The dispute over coverage of the ongoing controversy in Missouri is the
latest in a series of rifts between MBC leaders and Word & Way. The
MBC executive board voted 25-20 in April to no longer recognize it as
the MBC's official newspaper. The board announced it would begin a new,
official MBC newsjournal soon, starting with an Internet version, then
ultimately a print publication. More details on the new newsjournal
could be announced as early as the week of May 20.
"The action to create a new journal that will be the official news
journal of the Missouri Baptist Convention hits close to home,"
Webb wrote in a Word & Way opinion column April 18. "Word &
Way has never been granted that title officially in 106 years of
service, but the newspaper has consistently been the Missouri Baptist's
source for honest, dependable information and inspiration."
MBC messengers at the 2001 state convention overwhelmingly voted to
escrow approximately $475,000 in funds earmarked for the Word & Way
in 2002 following the vote by its trustees to become self-perpetuating.
Word & Way also sells subscriptions, mostly to the same Southern
Baptists in the state who have supported it through Cooperative Program
gifts.
Despite the legal uncertainties, the Word & Way continues to operate
from offices in the MBC state headquarters building in Jefferson City.
"We have been Christ-like in not evicting them, even though they
have no lease and seemingly a bias against us by continuing to
facilitate a splinter convention (the new Baptist General Convention of
Missouri) whose objective is not to build, but further divide the
Missouri Baptist Convention," Curtis said.
Indeed as recently as May 16 Word & Way published a story headlined
"BGCM launches search for first executive director." It also
has run stories concerning the activities of the Cooperative Baptist
Fellowship of Missouri as recently as May 2. CBF Missouri is the state
organization affiliated with the national CBF, a breakaway group unhappy
with the conservative direction of the SBC. Conservatives in Missouri
are concerned that the self-perpetuating trustee boards could be the
first step toward the five entities affiliating with the CBF.
Webb said in his April 18 editorial that the Word & Way had
"run two news stories" about the new convention and "a
lot more" about the concerns of conservatives in recent years.
|