|
February 2000
Published by the Missouri Baptists Laymen's
Association
Mainstream
Missouri Baptists:
A Political Front Group for
the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship in Missouri
In April of 1998, the Missouri Baptist Laymen’s
Association officially launched Project
1000, an effort to begin electing conservative, pro-SBC officers committed
to preserving the Missouri Baptist Convention’s historic alignment with the
Southern Baptist Convention. The primary concern of Project
1000 was identified as the growing influence of the Cooperative Baptist
Fellowship (CBF) within the Missouri Baptist Convention (MBC) and the
theological and social liberalism that is so deeply entrenched within the CBF.
Believing that the vast majority of Missouri Baptists are
morally, socially and theologically conservative, Project 1000 emphasized that it was our desire to see the leadership
of the Missouri Baptist Convention move from a pro-CBF center-left majority that
has been willing to tolerate liberalism, to a pro-SBC center- right majority
whose leadership would reflect a commitment to sound Biblical truth.
However, raising such concerns about the blatant liberalism within the
CBF would prove to be an unpopular endeavor among moderate MBC leaders.
In July of 1998, a group of moderate, pro-CBF Missouri
Baptist Convention leaders announced the formation of “Mainstream Missouri
Baptists” for the specific purpose of opposing the efforts of
Project 1000.
Led by former MBC president Dr. Doyle Sager, the group ran a full-page ad
in the September 10, 1998 issue of Word
& Way opposing Project 1000
and conservative pro-SBC leaders. At
the bottom of the ad, however, were two very significant statements:
First; “We are not affiliated
with CBF.” Second; “We
are not affiliated with Texas Baptists Committed.”
Mainstream Missouri Baptists
and the CBF
Though Mainstream Missouri Baptists (MMB) boldly declares
that it is not affiliated with CBF, its public support and alignment with CBF in
conjunction with its open hostility toward the conservative leadership of the
Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) has made clear its vision for the future
course of the Missouri Baptist Convention.
On the back page of the May and June 1999 issues of the MMB
newsletter, the group identified Project
1000 and those supportive of the Southern Baptist Convention as
“Fundamentalists.” Those, on
the other hand, opposed to the Southern Baptist Convention and those supportive
of the CBF were identified as “Traditional Baptists.”
The newsletter then states: “There
are two organizations which can help… traditional Southern Baptists in
Missouri. One is the CBF of
Missouri and the other is Mainstream Missouri Baptists.”
Though MMB is not officially affiliated with the CBF,
several of its board members are:
·
Dr. John Hughes:
Dr. Hughes, a former president of the Missouri Baptist Convention and
pastor of First Baptist Church in Independence, is a member of the national CBF
Coordinating Council.[i]
·
Rev. Pete Hill:
Rev. Hill, a brother to MBC executive director Jim Hill, is pastor of
Wornall Road Baptist Church in Kansas City and a former member of the national
CBF Coordinating Council.[ii]
·
Rev. Bob Webb:
Rev. Webb is pastor of Memorial Baptist Church in Columbia and is a
member of the national CBF Coordinating Council.[iii]
·
Larry Jones:
Mr. Jones is a member of First Baptist Church in Jefferson City and has
served on the Missouri CBF Coordinating Council.[iv]
Dr. Doyle Sager,
also a former president of the Missouri Baptist Convention and president of MMB,
served as host pastor of the 1998 Missouri CBF General Assembly.[v]
Dr. Sager is pastor of First Baptist Church in Jefferson City which is
listed as one of nine pro-CBF Missouri Baptist churches on the Missouri CBF web
page.[vi]
(MBC executive director Jim Hill and Word
& Way editor Bill Webb are both members of Dr. Sager’s church.)
The former pastor of First Baptist, Jefferson City, Gary Parker, is now
the coordinator of Baptist Principles for the national CBF.
Just after the 1999 annual meeting of the Missouri Baptist
Convention, a special edition of Connect,
the Missouri CBF newsletter, listed the top ten initiatives for the next two or
three years. One of the listed
initiatives is for the Missouri CBF to: “Help
Mainstream Missouri Baptists succeed” in defeating Project
1000.[vii]
“Mainstream”
– A Euphemism for CBF
In a press release announcing the formation of Mainstream
Missouri Baptists, Dr. Doyle Sager stated:
“For lack of a better term, we call ourselves ‘Mainstream Missouri
Baptists.’”[viii]
However, the term “mainstream” has become the descriptive term of
choice for those sympathetic to the CBF -- a euphemism for “moderate” and
“liberal.”
Since its very beginning, the Missouri CBF has used the
phrase “Mainstream Missouri Baptists” to describe those sympathetic to the
CBF.[ix]
Likewise, the term “mainstream” has become a favorite of the national
CBF. In an eight-page CBF
publication entitled “A Conversation with Daniel Vestal,” the CBF
coordinator identifies CBF “moderates” as “the mainstream of Christian
faith and Baptist identity:” He
writes:
…I used to resent the term
‘moderate.’ It sounded lukewarm
or half-hearted…and I don’t ever want to be described as a lukewarm
Christian. But in recent years,
events in Baptist life have led many to reconsider the labels applied to us. The Baptists who make up the Fellowship are frequently
described by the media and others as ‘moderates.’
In my own case, I have come to identify with the term in the sense that
it describes the mainstream of
Christian faith and Baptist identity.[x]
(emphasis ours)
In the August 1998 issue of Connect, an article appears encouraging Missouri Baptists to abandon
the Southern Baptist Convention’s International Mission Board in favor of the
CBF’s Global Missions program. The
newsletter states: “You have
other options. Contact CBF of
Missouri about the 3M Plan -- Missouri,
Missionary, Mainstream.”[xi]
(emphasis ours) In an undated 1998
Missouri CBF letter opposing Project 1000,
the group identifies the things they believe in as “mainstream Baptist values.” (emphasis ours)
Table
of Contents
Next
page
[i] 1992 CBF General Assembly
Resource Book, pg. 48. Also see
1998 General Assembly Resource Book, pg. 97, non-voting member of
Coordinating Council. Also see
1999 CBF General Assembly Resource Book, pg. 63, non voting member.
[ii] CBF General Assembly
Resource Book, 1996 list of CBF leaders from 1991-1995, pgs. F.6-F.7.
Pete Hill also served on a “fact -finding committee” to study if
CBF should become a convention. See
Fellowship News, October, 1995,
pg. 13.
[iv] Word
& Way, April 17, 1997, pg. 5.
[v] Word
& Way, April 30, 1998, pg. 9. Also
see Missouri CBF newsletter, Connect,
Vol. 7, No. 2, pg. 1.
[vii] Missouri CBF newsletter,
“special edition” after the 1999 annual meeting of the Missouri Baptist
Convention, pg. 1.
[viii] Mainstream Missouri
Baptists press release. Also
see: ‘“Mainstream Missouri Baptists’ oppose Project 1000”Word
& Way, August 13, 1998, pg. 3.
[ix] Missouri CBF publication,
“Partnering with Baptist Fellowship of Missouri.”
This flyer was mailed out with a letter from Missouri CBF moderator
Greg Hunt, December 20, 1993.
[x] A CBF publication entitled:
“A Conversation with Daniel Vestal.”
Available on the CBF web site at www.cbfonline.org
[xi] Missouri CBF newsletter, Connect,
“Are Missionaries Being Abandoned?”
August, 1998.
|