|
The
Interfaith Alliance Board of Directors:
While much more could be said about The Interfaith Alliance
and its pro-homosexual activities, certainly, the information presented is
sufficient to raise this question: How
could Dr. David Currie, coordinator of Texas Baptists Committed, serving as an
officer of the TIA board of directors, be so unaware of all this information
that he could honestly declare:
I have been on the [TIA] board
three years and have never missed a meeting.
The issues of homosexuality and abortion have never been mentioned during
a meeting, nor to me in private conversation by a fellow [TIA board] member.[i]
TIA’s commitment to pro-homosexual activism is nothing
more than a reflection of its board members and their commitment to the full
normalization of homosexuality. A
brief look at a few of the TIA board members that have served with Dr. Currie
further reveals the degree of their commitment.
·
Rev. Meg Riley is the
former director of the Unitarian Universalist Association’s Office of Gay and
Lesbian Concerns. Riley, who is
openly a lesbian, recently signed the SIECUS declaration supporting
homosexual marriage and the ordination of homosexual persons.
Rev. Riley also signed the 1996 letter to Congress published by the
Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice (RCRC) supporting the partial-birth
abortion procedure.
·
Bishop Edmond Browning,
retired presiding bishop of the Episcopal Church, presented his name before
Congress in support of gays in the military.
Rev. Browning signed the SIECUS declaration supporting homosexual
marriage and the ordination of homosexual persons.
Rev. Browning also signed the RCRC letter supporting the partial-birth
abortion procedure.
·
Herbert Valentine, the
founding president of TIA and a former moderator of the Presbyterian Church USA,
also signed the SIECUS declaration supporting homosexual marriage and the
ordination of homosexual persons.
·
Rev. J. Phillip Wogaman,
is pastor of Foundry United Methodist Church in Washington D.C., the church
attended by President Clinton. Wogaman
“outspokenly favors the ordination of practicing homosexuals” and in 1995
hosted a symposium on homosexuality and shared his pulpit with…Episcopal
Bishop John Shelby Spong. The
Bishop alleged St. Paul was a ‘self-hating gay man,’ while Wogaman
acknowledged that King David might have also been a gender bender.”[ii]
Rev. Wogaman also signed the 1996 RCRC letter supporting the
partial-birth abortion procedure.
·
Dr. John Swomley, is a
former professor of Christian ethics, at St. Paul School of Theology in Kansas
City and has been an outspoken advocate for homosexuality.
Swomley is a long-time member of the national ACLU board of directors,
where most recently, he served as secretary.
The ACLU’s Lesbian & Gay Rights Project has been a leading force in
the battle for the full normalization of homosexuality.[iii]
Swomley has also served as chairman of the ACLU’s national Church/State
Committee and is president of Americans for Religious Liberty, whose executive
director, Edd Doerr, is president of the American Humanist Association.
Doerr was a signer of the Humanist
Manifesto II. Swomley also
writes a regular column in the Humanist magazine.
Dr. Somley also signed the RCRC letter supporting the partial-birth
abortion procedure. Three other TIA
board members serve on the national
advisory board of ARL.[iv]
Former BJCPA executive director, James E. Wood Jr., serves on the ARL
board of directors.
·
Rev. Robert Meneilly,
heads a group called “Mainstream Coalition,” which works closely with the
ACLU, the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, the National Organization
for Women, Planned Parenthood, and the Pro-Choice Action League.
He has been recognized as a champion for homosexual causes, having
received an award from the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation in 1994.[v]
Rev. Meneilly was a signer of the SIECUS declaration supporting
homosexual marriage and the ordination of homosexual persons.
·
Denise Davidoff, a TIA
vice president, is the moderator of the Unitarian Universalist Association,
signed the SIECUS declaration supporting homosexual marriage and the ordination
of homosexual persons.
·
Bishop Frederick James,
a TIA vice president, presented his name before Congress in support of gays in
the military.
·
Rev. Amos Brown,
“embraced homosexual marriage while running - successfully - for the San
Francisco Board of Supervisors.”[vi]
·
Dr. Diane Porter, a
former vice president of the National Council of Churches and a former executive
in the Episcopal Church, “supported a new church seminary policy that welcomed
‘committed same-sex couples.’”[vii]
·
Bishop Thomas Gumbleton,
a Roman Catholic Bishop from Detroit, stated in 1993 while advocating acceptance
of homosexuals in the military, that “Homosexual orientation is certainly not
wrong, unless you want to say God made a mistake.”[viii]
·
Joan Brown Campbell,
outgoing General Secretary of the National Council of Churches, presented her
name before Congress in support of gays in the military and has “demonstrated
for homosexual rights.”[ix]
·
William P. Thompson, a
former moderator of the Presbyterian Church USA, has also served as president of
the National Council of Churches, a former board member of People for the
American Way, and a member of the central committee of the World Council of
Churches. In 1991, Thompson
“defended a report within the Presbyterian Church (USA) that urged acceptance
of non-martial sexual behavior among heterosexuals and homosexuals.”[x]
Mainstream
Missouri Baptists, Texas Baptists Committed and the CBF:
Reasons for Concern
Dr. Currie’s position as an officer on the board of
directors of The Interfaith Alliance is symbolic of what’s
wrong with the CBF and why there has been such concern
about the growing influence of the CBF within our state Baptist conventions.
TIA is an organization whose board is made up of advocates for
abortion rights and “gay rights” --- it
is the Religious Left at its best, using “religious voices” to advocate
those things which are far from the “mainstream” of Bible-believing Southern
Baptists.
For too long, CBF leaders like Dr. C. Welton Gaddy and Dr.
David Currie have been allowed to redefine the pro-homosexual/pro-abortion
Religious Left as “mainstream,” while at the same time portraying
conservative, Bible-believing Southern Baptists as “fundamentalists” and
conservative Christian organizations like Focus on the Family as “religious
extremists.”
There are indeed two very different and competing visions
for the future of Southern Baptist state conventions. In Missouri, one of those competing visions -- Project
1000 – says: We believe the
vast majority of Missouri Baptists are morally, socially and theologically
conservative and that the Southern Baptist Convention, with its commitment to
missions, evangelism and theological integrity, best reflects who we are and
what we believe. The other, Mainstream Missouri Baptists, which has openly aligned itself with
Dr. David Currie’s Texas Baptists Committed and the CBF, has publicly declared
their opposition to the conservative Southern Baptist Convention.
Americans United for Separation of Church and State said it
well in a 1998 editorial: ‘“You
are known by the company you keep’… You
can tell a lot about our organization by considering who stands with us… and
who stands against us.”[xi]
May we as Southern Baptists be like “the children of Issachar, which
were men that had understanding of the times, to know what Israel ought to
do.” (I Chronicles 12:32)
Table
of Contents
Previous
page
Next Article
[i] Texas Baptists Committed
newsletter, National Edition, March 1999, pg. 1.
[ii] “Walter Cronkite
Doesn’t Tell it the way it is,” March 18, 1997, published by the
Institute on Religion and Democracy. Also
see “Homosexual Group Aims to Silence Opponents,” published by the
Family Research Council, April 3, 1996.
Also see Washington Times, April 13, 1996, pg. C4, “Foundry a
symbol of Methodist differences.”
[iv] Voice
of Reason, the newsletter of Americans for Religious Liberty, 1996, No.
4, pg. 2.
[v] “Walter Cronkite
Doesn’t Tell it the way it is,” March 18, 1997, published by the
Institute on Religion and Democracy. Also
see, Washington Times, March 31,
1997, pg. A19, “Mr. Cronkite’s religion.”
[vi] Washington
Times, March 31, 1997, pg. A19, “Mr. Cronkite’s religion.”
[viii] “Walter Cronkite
Doesn’t Tell it the way it is,” March 18, 1997, published by the
Institute on Religion and Democracy. Also see Washington Times, March 31, 1997, pg. A19, “Mr. Cronkite’s
religion.”
[x]
“Walter Cronkite Doesn’t Tell it the way it is,” March 18,
1997, published by the Institute on Religion and Democracy.
|