|
Cooperative
Baptist Fellowship
CBF AIDS Resource Packet
In 1994, the Ethics and
Public Policy Ministry Group of the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship published
its first resource packet entitled, HIV/AIDS
Ministry: Putting A Face on AIDS. While
the 80-page packet devotes much space to justifying “homosexual
orientation,” nowhere does it identify homosexual behavior as sin.
The following are
interesting excerpts from the CBF AIDS resource packet:
God Made Us This Way
“During pregnancy, the
fetus is developing characteristics that will determine the person’s sexual
orientation. Therefore, a person does not choose to be homosexual or
heterosexual.” (pg. 16)
“Do we choose our
[sexual] orientation? Most persons answer that question with a resounding
‘NO!’ This supports the scientific research. We do not choose our sexual
orientation, but rather we ‘awaken’ to it.”
(pgs. 17-18)
“…sexuality is a gift
from God… We have a responsibility to enhance and educate our children and
young people about sexuality, sexual identity, and sexual orientation.”
(pg. 20)
What Is Normal?
“The purpose of this
section is to discuss ways our presuppositions about what is normal enter into
how we, as the Church, treat others outside our own sexual norms. The Church
needs to be a place where sexual identity and orientation can be discussed,
developed, and fostered. We need to minister to our children, adolescents and
our young adults in the church.”(pg.
18)
Celibacy
Not Always Possible
“…the writings of
Paul, indicates that celibacy is not possible for everyone. It is only for
those who have been called to that state by the Holy Spirit. God said, ‘It
is not good for human beings to be alone’ (Genesis 2:18). That statement is
true for all persons of all sexual orientation.” (pg.
19)
Redefining
The Family
“No longer is family
defined as a mother, father, son, daughter a dog, and a station wagon. Such
definition has changed through time, circumstances, and disintegration. Family
may be defined as a basic, primary group of caring relationships within
intimate boundaries… James Nelson Paints a clear picture of his experience
with the contemporary family with this word picture, ‘On our floor are nine
apartments… in only two of the nine (apartments) are there married
couples… There are couples who have no intent of marrying. There are single
parent families. There are blended families…gay families and lesbian
families…yet they are constituted as families by enduring covenants.’”(pg.25)
Changing
Attitudes & Sermons
“If we are serious about
changing our attitudes toward sexuality, sexual orientation and HIV/AID, how
do we want our sermons to change?” (pg.
22)
CBF
Mission Statement – Celebrating God’s Gift Of Diversity
According to the CBF’s
proposed mission statement, “we will celebrate God’s gift of diversity
among the individuals and churches of the Fellowship.”
However, under a section entitled “Our Priorities,” which stated:
“Affirming our racial, ethnic, and gender diversity as a gift of God,” the
attendees of the 1995 CBF General Assembly voted to amend that section to
allow undefined diversity to be
attributed to God, clearly opening the CBF’s doors to the claim that
homosexuality is “a gift of God.” That
section was amended to read:
Affirming our diversity
as a gift of God, including but not
limited to race, ethnicity and gender.” (emphasis ours) (1995 CBF
General Assembly Resource Book, pp. D.2-D.3 and Fellowship
News, July/August 1995, pg. 10.)
The motion to amend was
made by Ron Serino of Metro Baptist Church in New York, New York.
The pastor of Metro Baptist Church is David Waugh, who at that time was
a member of the CBF coordinating council and a member of the Advisory
Committee of the CBF-funded Baptist Peace Fellowship of North America, a group
which earlier that year had issued a statement advocating, among other things,
the ordination of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered persons.
(See
BPFNA)
In a press room
interview with CBF General Assembly Committee chairman George Mason after the
vote to amend the mission statement, the chief CBF spokesman explained why the
CBF Administrative Committee was opposed to the mission statement amendment:
It’s simply a matter
of saying that already we had named three things that we had been very
intentional about from the very beginning [racial, ethnic, and gender
diversity]… And this question
of how do you adjudicate what next gets to be there, once you say ‘not
limited to’ -- which we
now have -- we don’t know how
one is ever going to adjudicate that…whether its ageism, or homosexuality
or whatever that case may be.
[ Back ] [ Contents ] [ Next ]
|