Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) har avklart sin holdning til bitcoin (BTC) og andre kryptovalutaer, noe som gjør det klart at kryptohandlere i landet står fritt til å utføre sin virksomhet på peer-to-peer-basis, slik forbudet gjorde ikke forbyr bruken av kryptoer, men det er snarere et forsøk på å beskytte långivere under dets virkeområde, ifølge en rapport fra lokal nyhetspublikasjon Today Ng, 20. mars 2021.
I en noe positiv utvikling for Nigerias spirende kryptovalutaindustri har landets bankregulator, Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN), pekt mer lys på sitt forbud mot bitcoin- og altcoin-transaksjoner i staten.
I følge kilder nær den siste utviklingen har CBN-guvernøren Godwin Emefiele gjort det klart at dets direktiv bare hindrer finansinstitusjoner og banker under dets jurisdiksjon fra å betjene kryptorelaterte virksomheter eller delta i kryptorelaterte aktiviteter, og prøver ikke å gjøre bitcoinhandel i seg selv, en ulovlig handling.
Emefiele som ikke var fysisk til stede under det nylig avholdte CBN 30. seminaret for finanskorrespondenter og forretningsredaktører, avklarte bankens holdning via sin representant, Adamu Lamtek, viseadministrator, Corporates Services.
“CBN satte ikke begrensninger på bruken av kryptovalutaer, og vi fraråder ikke folk å handle med den. Det vi nettopp har gjort var å forby kryptovaluta-transaksjoner i banksektoren, ”erklærte regulatoren.
Det vil bli husket at CBN tidligere i februar 2021 sendte ut en uttalelse til finansinstitusjoner under sitt virke, og minner dem om at de ikke har lov til å betjene børser og bitcoin.
“CBN-rundskrivet fra 12. januar 2017, ref FPR / DIR / GEN / CIR / 06/010, som advarte innskuddspenger (DMBer), ikke-bankinstitusjoner, andre finansinstitusjoner og medlemmer av publikum om risikoen forbundet med krypto transaksjoner refererer. I tillegg til tidligere reguleringsdirektiver om emnet, ønsker banken med dette å minne regulerte institusjoner på at det er forbudt å handle med kryptokurver eller legge til rette for betaling for kryptobørs, „erklærte CBN den gangen og la til“ Følgelig er alle DMB, NBFI og OFI rettet å identifisere personer og / eller enheter som handler i eller driver kryptobørs i sine systemer og sørger for at slike kontoer stenges umiddelbart. ”
CBN truet også med å straffe enheter som strider mot ovennevnte direktiv.
Siden den gang har sentraliserte børser i regionen, inkludert Luno, Binance og en rekke andre, stoppet innskudd og uttak av naira. Imidlertid har P2P-handelssteder fortsatt å blomstre, med ukentlig bitcoin-volum i regionen som representerer over 40 prosent av det totale kontinentets totale.
Med den siste utviklingen forventes det at flere børser i regionen vil begynne å lansere P2P-handelssteder.
The computing power, or Bitcoin hashrate, has reached a new all-time high, which translates into increased activity. At the same time, the difficulty of the Blockchain network to process blocks, has also increased above its highest figure.
This scenario is presented as an increase in the connections of new Crypto Trader review equipment in the network. These are probably the ASICs that have been acquired by large mining companies in North America.
It should be remembered that firms such as Marathon, Riot Blockchain and others have made massive purchases in recent months. Likewise, it is important to highlight that the price of the most popular crypto-currency has recovered from the sharp drop at the beginning of the week and is once again close to 40K.
The 100 Richest Bitcoin Addresses
One of the strongest indicators of the health of the Bitcoin network is the state of its hashrate. This indicates, when it’s high, that a large number of miners have joined the competition to process blocks, which makes the network more robust and more complex and secure against possible attacks. In short, it decentralizes it to a greater extent.
When the hashrate decreases, it means that there are disconnections and the network becomes more vulnerable. In that sense, the growth of the computing power of the last days can be considered as a sign that the mining business is proliferating and developing in an optimal way.
On the other hand, the incorporation of new miners, makes the mathematical algorithms to process blocks to be solved faster. In response, the network adjusts the difficulty of these algorithms to make them more complex. Consequently, the goal is to maintain the 10-minute average per block, regardless of the number of miners.
The difficulty of the Bitcoin network is adjusted every 2,016 blocks (about two weeks), so that mining is easier if the hashrate is low or harder if it’s high.
Currently, the Bitcoin hash rate is 151.7 EH/s. Source: Blockchain.comCurrently, the Bitcoin hashrate stands at 151.7 EH/s.
A rapidly growing business
At the moment, the difficulty of Bitcoin’s Blockchain network is 20.61T. Its last adjustment was on January 9th at the level of block 665,280. The next adjustment will be on block 667,296 approximately on January 23rd. If Bitcoin’s computing power keeps increasing, the difficulty will rise again.
It should be noted that the last major difficulty setting was on October 17, 2020. At that time the network reached 20.00T. Since then it had fallen due to a respective drop in Bitcoin hashrate at the end of the rainy season in some provinces of China.
As reported in CryptoTrend, the winter in China allows the energy value in some provinces to decrease. Excess hydroelectric power allows many miners to migrate to provinces like Sichuan. At the end of the monsoon, the miners are disconnected. This makes the hashrate go up and down several times a year.
At present, according to the graphs on Blockchain.com, Bitcoin’s hashrate is 151.7 EH/s.
All of this, as already mentioned, ensures that the Bitcoin network is in the best condition to operate. The mining business continues to expand and more miners are joining the race to get as many coins as possible.
If the law on crypto wallets is actually approved in the USA, this would mean a considerable amount of additional work for crypto exchanges.
US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin recently proposed requiring exchanges and crypto platforms to verify the identities of customers transferring digital assets to self-hosted wallets.
„After a preliminary examination of the FinCen proposal and the wallet verification requirements, I think that the proposal to extend the CTR requirement to crypto exchanges and to have to capture the physical address of the recipient would mean a large operational and administrative burden for exchanges“ , said the head of the conformity department at OKCoin Megan Monroe-Coleman to Cointelegraph.
For weeks, rumors of new crypto wallet laws went around in the crypto space. After all, Mnuchin made this proposal on December 18, before leaving office. The new regulation, which is so far only a proposal, provides that parties who send crypto amounts of more than $ 3,000 to an independent wallet will identify themselves . When you switch between exchanges, the limit goes up to $ 10,000.
„FinCen specifically cited ’national security‘ as the reason for the proposal and the extremely short time allowed for comments,“ said Monroe-Coleman. He added:
„Therefore, OKCoin comments will focus on the challenges we foresee for our business and the industry as a whole. We would like to ask FinCs to issue practical and clear guidelines and allow a generous grace period in order for the industry to implement it successfully Because there is no clear solution or industry-wide tools that can help us with compliance. “
However, the proposal was less negative than initially expected. Before it was released, some US Congress members opposed revealing possible details about the law. There was talk of a whitelist of admissible addresses that was not included in the final version of the proposal.
Ethereum steht vor einer großen Hürde in der Nähe von 595 USD, XRP ist in Richtung der Unterstützung von 0,435 USD gefallen.
XLM, AAVE und ADA sind gefallen, DOT und SUSHI bewegen sich nach oben.
In den vergangenen Sitzungen handelte der The News Spy in einer Spanne unterhalb des Hauptwiderstandsniveaus von 19.500 USD. Auf der Unterseite blieb BTC in der Nähe des Niveaus von 19.000 USD gut geboten. Der Preis steigt derzeit (05:00 UTC) und könnte einen weiteren Versuch unternehmen, ein zinsbullisches Momentum über 19.500 USD zu erlangen.
In ähnlicher Weise nähern sich die meisten wichtigen Altcoins wichtigen Hürden, einschließlich Ethereum, Litecoin, EOS, XLM, LINK, BNB, TRX, Bitcoin Cash und ADA. ETH/USD könnte sich erholen, wenn es einen klaren Ausbruch über 595 USD und 600 USD gibt. Auf der anderen Seite fiel XRP/USD um mehr als 10 % und wurde sogar in der Nähe der Unterstützung von 0,435 USD gehandelt.
Bitcoin-Preis
Es gab einen erneuten Anstieg des Bitcoin-Preises über den Widerstand von USD 19.200. BTC testete erneut die Widerstandszone von 19.500 USD und konsolidiert nun in der Nähe der 19.400 USD-Marke. Bei einem Durchbruch nach unten unter die Niveaus von 19.320 USD und 19.240 USD könnte der Preis die Unterstützung im Bereich von 19.000 USD wieder aufsuchen.
Auf der Oberseite müssen die Bullen oberhalb der Marke von 19.500 USD an Stärke gewinnen. Ein erfolgreicher 4-Stunden-Schlusskurs über dem Niveau von 19.500 USD könnte vielleicht eine starke Aufwärtsbewegung in Richtung 20.000 USD oder sogar höher auslösen.
Ethereum-Preis
Der Ethereum-Preis unternahm einen weiteren Versuch, den Widerstand von USD 595 zu überwinden, scheiterte jedoch. ETH handelt jetzt oberhalb des Unterstützungsniveaus von USD 580. Die nächste wichtige Unterstützung liegt in der Nähe des Niveaus von USD 575. Weitere Verluste könnten den Preis in Richtung des Niveaus von 555 USD führen.
Bei einem erneuten Anstieg könnte der Preis auf Hürden in der Nähe von USD 595 stoßen. Ein klarer Ausbruch über 595 USD und 600 USD ist für eine starke Rallye erforderlich.
Bitcoin-Cash-, Litecoin- und XRP-Preis
Der Bitcoin-Cash-Preis gewinnt oberhalb des Widerstands von USD 280 an Schwung. BCH ist um über 5% gestiegen und bewegt sich auf die 290 USD-Marke zu. Der Hauptwiderstand auf der Oberseite liegt in der Nähe des Niveaus von 295 und 300 USD. Ein klarer Durchbruch über die 300-USD-Barriere könnte die Gewinne in Richtung 320-USD-Niveau beschleunigen.
Litecoin (LTC) konsolidiert sich in der Nähe des Unterstützungsniveaus von USD 80,00. Ein Durchbruch nach unten unter das Niveau von USD 80,00 könnte einen Schub in Richtung des Unterstützungsniveaus von USD 76,50 auslösen. Umgekehrt könnte eine klare Bewegung über das Niveau von 81,20 USD und 82,20 USD den Preis in Richtung des Niveaus von 85,00 USD führen.
Der XRP-Preis hat sich unterdurchschnittlich entwickelt und ist um über 10 % gefallen. Der Preis handelte unter vielen wichtigen Unterstützungen in der Nähe von 0,485 USD und 0,465 USD. Er sprang sogar unter das Niveau von 0,450 USD und wurde nahe dem Niveau von 0,435 USD gehandelt. Er erholt sich derzeit, aber die Bullen könnten in der Nähe von USD 0,468 und USD 0,475 zu kämpfen haben.
In den vergangenen Stunden drehten mehrere Altcoins nach unten, darunter XLM, AAVE, ADA, OMG, XEM, UNI, RSR, EWT und MKR. Umgekehrt sind DOT und SUSHI gestiegen und liegen über 4% im Plus.
Insgesamt könnte der Bitcoin-Preis einen weiteren Versuch unternehmen, die 19.500 USD-Marke zu überwinden. Wenn BTC dies gelingt, könnte es eine starke Aufwärtsbewegung geben. Wenn nicht, könnte der Preis in naher Zukunft nach unten in Richtung USD 19.000 oder sogar USD 18.800 korrigieren.
The price of Bitcoin surpassed $ 19,000 on November 24th and hit $ 19,299 on Binance. As BTC rebounded, major alternative cryptocurrencies fell dramatically – including Ethereum and Ripple’s XRP.
It remains to be seen whether the trend of profits from altcoins flowing into Bitcoin Union will continue in the near future. One variable, however, could prevent the altcoin market from seeing a wider downturn – and that’s the resistance at $ 20,000.
Bitcoin has passed the $ 19,000 mark and is now approaching an all-time high of nearly $ 20,000.
But until the $ 20,000 mark is broken, it serves as an important area of resistance. So that could mean that the price range is between $ 19,000 and $ 20,000.
If Bitcoin shows signs of consolidation between the two levels, it could help Altcoins rebound. Ethereum and Ripple’s XRP fell rapidly when BTC started rising, but have since rebounded.
Ripple’s XRP, for example, fell from $ 0.72 to $ 0.567, down 20% in a matter of hours. Although Ethereum saw a smaller pullback, it saw a similar price move.
Ethereum was down 5% as Bitcoin started its way towards $ 19,000 during the same period as XRP.
Ripple’s XRP saw a sharp decline during the day due to its extreme volatility. While XRP peaked below $ 0.8 on Binance, the token hit $ 0.9 on Coinbase. This caused a real frenzy about the crypto currency and even temporarily led to a Coinbase failure.
After the altcoin market retreats, the likelihood of a short-term recovery is higher than a continued correction.
In the short term, the $ 20,000 mark remains a crucial area of resistance for Bitcoin. Therefore, the likelihood of a recovery in the altcoin market remains high as long as BTC does not hit a new all-time high.
When BTC crosses the $ 20,000 mark, there is a high chance that it is soaking up most of the volume in the cryptocurrency market. Should this happen, the momentum of the altcoin market could weaken in the short term.
Ethereum is seeing a particularly sharp correction after hitting a multi-year high of $ 625.
ETH is likely to see a deep pullback due to a sell-the-news reaction from the market. On November 24th, Ethereum officially reached the threshold for the launch of Eth2.
ETH may have pulled back as cryptocurrencies tend to decline after big announcements. But traders had also predicted short-term consolidation after ETH hit $ 625.
An evaluation of the document published by Satoshi Nakamoto on 31 October 2008 that „set a financial revolution in motion“.
Has it really only been twelve years since 31 October 2008, the day Satoshi Nakamoto published a modest nine-page document describing a new online payment system called „Bitcoin“? Depending on one’s point of view, that pseudonymous white paper (whose author, or authors, remains unknown) has triggered a fintech revolution or, as some believe, „the biggest scam in history“.
To celebrate the anniversary of the publication of „Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System,“ Cointelegraph invited several experts to comment on its author’s enduring vision. Would Satoshi Nakamoto be happy with how Bitcoin and blockchain technology have developed and evolved over the past 12 years?
James Angel, associate professor at Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business, explained to Cointelegraph:
„He set in motion a financial revolution with the advent of DeFi apps, smart contracts and token offerings, as well as a payment revolution that is leading to Central Bank Digital Currency“.
Gina Pieters, Professor in the Faculty of Economics at the University of Chicago, commented:
„She would be happy to see the evolution and new applications of her vision.“
The influence of Bitcoin’s white paper (BTC) goes far beyond finance, according to Garrick Hileman, director of research at Blockchain.com:
„Its impact deserves the same consideration as other major technological innovations, such as the personal computer and the Internet.“
Satoshi’s vision was for a P2P digital money system, or decentralised, as indicated in the title of the white paper. The problem with digital commerce was to rely solely on „financial institutions as trusted third parties to process electronic payments,“ Satoshi wrote. This mechanism had inherent weaknesses. Transactions could be reversed, banks had to mediate disputes, and transaction costs were high. Satoshi’s solution is described in the second paragraph of the introduction to the white paper:
„We need an electronic payment system based on cryptographic evidence rather than trust, allowing any two counterparties to negotiate directly with each other without the need for a third party of trust.“
In the 12 years since the publication of the paper, the need for P2P transactions, without third parties interfering, has become a deep conviction among Bitcoin enthusiasts. On reflection, however, can we say that this aspect of Satoshi’s vision has been realised? David Yermack, professor of finance at Leonard N. Stern School of Business at the University of New York, explained to Cointelegraph:
„I think the biggest source of disappointment for Nakamoto is the increasing centralisation of blockchain governance in entities such as mining pools and even central banks, which are preparing to launch their own cryptocurrencies. Nakamoto’s mission was to challenge the hegemony of these institutions, and paradoxically it seems that the major digital currency issuers will be the central banks themselves.
Angel commented: „Satoshi would be stunned by the concentrated mining pool policies that currently dominate Bitcoin’s protocol. Instead, Pieters added that Satoshi would be disappointed that „Bitcoin’s main transactions do not take place through peer-to-peer exchanges, but are handled by centralised companies or exchanges.
The issue of fraud in digital transactions has always hovered over the industry, and Bitcoin Sunrise white paper has proposed a way to solve the long-standing problem of „double spending,“ where criminals spend the same money twice, which is not very complicated with e-currencies. The solution included a „distributed peer-to-peer time stamp server to generate computational evidence of the chronological order of transactions. In this way, Satoshi explained, „computationally impractical transactions to reverse would protect sellers from fraud.
Solving the problem of double spending is considered one of Satoshi’s greatest achievements today. Bitcoin’s blockchain has never been hacked (though the same cannot be said for the many crypto exchanges on which BTC trades). Nevertheless, the fraud associated with digital payments has not been expelled from the system. Would this have shocked Bitcoin’s founder?
Angel argues that Satoshi „would have been disappointed to discover that Bitcoin has not become a means of payment for everyday expenses but rather a store of value for fearful rich people and tax evaders. Moreover, Satoshi would „disapprove of the increase in inequality created by Bitcoin’s history, with a few early adopters becoming whales and the remaining 99.99999% of the population as no-goods“. However, we can assume that the creator of Bitcoin, whether man, woman or group, would have been amazed at the scale of the adoption of BTC, as Yermack pointed out:
„Nakamoto would be amazed by the growth of blockchain projects and the thousands of digital coins and tokens that have been created in Bitcoin’s image. A striking testimony to this is that in 2010 Nakamoto set the size of the blocks on the Bitcoin blockchain at 1MB, commenting mysteriously that ‚we can always increase it later when necessary‘.“
He had no idea that the blockchain would become overloaded within the next five or six years, Yermack continued, „and that a controversial debate, still unresolved, would erupt among several Bitcoin supporters on how best to further expand the blockchain’s capacity“.
Over the past 12 years, much of Satoshi’s original software code has been altered or replaced, Hileman added, but Bitcoin has nevertheless retained its core qualities, including „the limited offer of 21 million coins, open access, and resistance to censoring/manipulation. I believe Satoshi would be pleased with the software optimizations and improvements underway for these important core features that continue to this day.
Although the white paper talks a lot about transaction fees, CPU power, network nodes, proof-of-work chains and even the Gambler’s Ruin problem, it doesn’t dwell on the world in general, including the environment. Angel argues that Satoshi would be shocked by the environmental damage caused by Bitcoin’s mining competition, he adds:
„At the current hash rate and mining efficiency, Bitcoin mining is consuming about seven gigawatts of electricity, the equivalent of seven Chernobyl power plants.“
Although little is known about Satoshi’s political ideas, his creation in the form of the first blockchain crypto would also be disturbed by the idea of the Central Bank Digital Currency, and in some cases „these currencies are designed to allow oppressive governments to implement even greater surveillance and control over populations,“ Angel added.
Focusing on the white paper, Franklin Noll, monetary historian and president of Noll Historical Consulting, explained to Cointelegraph:
„His goal was to enable rapid, anonymous, low-cost, unmediated and irreversible transactions. So far, Bitcoin’s transactions, and many other blockchain transactions, have not proved to be particularly fast, anonymous or low-cost“.
„I think Satoshi would like to see more use of non-custodial wallets to store and exchange Bitcoins,“ commented Hileman, explaining how custodian companies that handle private cryptographic keys on behalf of Bitcoin owners „resemble traditional banks. He also believes that „Satoshi was not a fan of third-party financial intermediaries.
After just over a decade, what is the significance of Satoshi Nakamoto’s white paper? In the finance industry, „he has encouraged financial companies and central banks to prioritise the evaluation of their technologies, considering both increased digitisation and ongoing digital platforms,“ said Pieters, continuing:
„In some cases, such as new CBDC research, this has led to explorations of new systems, although they do not directly involve the adoption of blockchain technology.“
„Bitcoin and blockchain have radically changed the monetary world,“ added Noll. „Terms such as proof-of-work, distributed register technology, decentralized finance, programmable money and smart contract are now part of the lexicon of anyone who is seriously interested in the future of money and finance.
Hileman added:
„Moreover, we are only just beginning to understand the potential impact of blockchain technology in areas outside finance, such as digital identity, addressing false news and election fraud.“
„Nakamoto’s publication of the document in 2008 was a major breakthrough in financial reporting,“ explained NYU’s Yermack. „We are only beginning to understand its ramifications, but they seem to be extensive.“
The reader will not find the word „revolution“ in Satoshi’s document. Nowhere is there any talk of subverting the economic order or bridging the gap between rich and poor. It is an unpretentious treatise on electronic payments, which explains how to create a system in which they work effectively.
On his terms, Satoshi has achieved enormous success. He has promised a functional P2P digital payment system, and has kept his word. Bitcoin’s market value is $255 billion 12 years after the idea was launched.
Whether Bitcoin is also harming the environment, helping money launderers or supporting political regimes is beyond its remit. We can say that economic decentralisation continues to present governance challenges. How much „peer-to-peer“ does society really want? The global community will have to decide.
Twelve years after the publication of „Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System,“ we must remember that „as they say, revolutions do not always go as planned by the founders,“ Noll explained to Cointelegraph.
El destacado analista de cadenas Willy Woo cree que Bitcoin caerá hacia la brecha de CME en los bajos 11.000 dólares en un futuro próximo. El analista señaló que la cripto-moneda tiene una serie de factores bajistas que sugieren que caerá hacia ese nivel:
„Este es un análisis técnico a corto plazo en lugar de mis fundamentos normales; se advierte que el análisis a corto plazo es mucho menos confiable, más para los jugadores de casino. RESUMEN: Sospecho que el último hueco de la CME (lo que queda en verde) puede ser llenado.“
En primer lugar, Woo señaló que las tendencias subyacentes del mercado sugieren que existe una „distribución oculta“ de Bitcoin. Simultáneamente, el gráfico de BTC ha comenzado a parecerse a un patrón de distribución de libro de texto.
Esta confluencia indica que Bitcoin se deslizará hacia la brecha de la CME a 11.200 dólares en un futuro próximo. Eso representaría una caída del 2-3% de los precios actuales.
A pesar de estos factores a corto plazo que podrían comprimir el movimiento alcista del precio de Bitcoin, la tendencia a largo plazo sigue siendo positiva.
Woo explicó que los fundamentos de la criptodivisa en cadena siguen siendo alcistas. Dijo que confía tanto en que si BTC se retira hacia los 10.000 dólares, puede ser prudente desplegar capital en la moneda:
„Los fundamentos de la cadena, que son de 3 a 6 semanas en los plazos mínimos, siguen sin cambiar en modo alcista, si conseguimos un retroceso, lo tomaría como una oportunidad para desplegar el capital en BTC si no lo logras en la zona de los 10k“.
Cabe destacar que la tasa de hash de la red de Bitcoin ha alcanzado recientemente un nuevo máximo histórico. Esto sugiere que los mineros están más seguros que nunca de que la criptografía seguirá subiendo, lo que significa que serán rentables.
PayPal ha llevado los servicios de pago en línea al siguiente nivel y por lo tanto se está implementando en las criptodivisas también. Si tienes planes de comprar bitcoin, puedes comprar con PayPal sin pensarlo dos veces. Las cuentas de PayPal se utilizan ahora principalmente para comprar bitcoin debido a su red segura para encriptar las transferencias de dinero entre dos partes. Las personas que no conocen la verdadera eficacia de PayPal deben leer este artículo para entender su potencial. Si sólo lo utilizabas para los pagos en línea, ahora puedes comprar bitcoin y también ir a comerciar con PayPal.
En este artículo, conocerán algunas de las buenas razones por las que comprar bitcoin con PayPal es una mejor opción.
Accesibilidad entre pares con los vendedores
Hay muchos mercados diferentes que aceptan PayPal como un método genuino. Puede conectarse con los vendedores o compradores directamente antes de comprar con PayPal. Tiene la oportunidad de hablar con el vendedor en persona o a través del chat para juzgar su credibilidad. También puede comprobar los detalles asociados en su pantalla de operaciones antes de procesar el pago. Además, PayPal también permite autenticaciones de seguridad de dos factores para garantizar los aspectos de privacidad. Después de que el vendedor verifique el pago recibido, el bitcoin se transfiere a la cuenta del comprador. En este proceso completo, PayPal hace que los pagos sean más rápidos y fáciles.
Transacción de un solo toque con PayPal
PayPal ha integrado ahora su función de pago con un solo toque con la que la gente prefiere comprar bitcoins con PayPal. Es necesario configurar la configuración en PayPal antes de ir al mercado para comprar los bitcoins. Una vez que esté listo con la configuración, puede seguir adelante con la función de transacción de un solo toque para comprar bitcoin y otras criptodivisas. Esto hace que la transacción sea más rápida, por lo que tendrá su bitcoin en su cartera en poco tiempo. El vendedor recibirá el pago en su cuenta en poco tiempo, lo que hará que la transferencia de bitcoin sea más rápida.
PayPal tiene una excelente función de protección de reembolso que lo convierte en una plataforma muy relevante para la compra. Si planea comprar con PayPal, debe saber que esta plataforma de pago en línea le reembolsará el pago completo si el vendedor rechaza los términos acordados de transferencia de bitcoin en el intercambio. Entre todos los mercados, PayPal es el único que ofrece tal seguridad y confianza a los usuarios. PayPal no sólo es un método de pago conveniente, sino que también se gana la confianza de la seguridad financiera. Por lo tanto, la gente suele preferir comprar bitcoin usando sólo PayPal.
Todas y cada una de las transacciones que se realizan a través de la cuenta de PayPal están encriptadas. Esto se incrusta en la plataforma con la intención de proteger los datos sensibles de los usuarios. Hay varios mecanismos antifraude incrustados en PayPal que mejoran las medidas de seguridad de los usuarios. Junto con eso, todas las transacciones son monitoreadas 24*7 por PayPal para erradicar todo tipo de actividades fraudulentas. Las personas que prefieren PayPal para comprar bitcoin son conscientes del hecho de que todos los datos sensibles y vulnerables están encriptados y seguros con PayPal.
PayPal es considerablemente una de las plataformas más seguras para comprar monedas de bits. Puede referirse a cualquiera de las plataformas de CFD como eToro para comprar bitcoins. Estas plataformas CFD permiten a PayPal comprar a través de una red segura sin ninguna posibilidad de transacciones fraudulentas. Usted obtiene las especulaciones de precios y el acceso completo a las monedas sin ningún tipo de molestia. La reputación de PayPal se extiende por todo el mundo. Ayuda a las empresas a conectarse, y con la evolución de bitcoin, esta plataforma de pago en línea ha logrado llegar a mercados encriptados para manejar transacciones orientadas a bitcoin también.
Estas son algunas de las ventajas que demuestran la verdadera eficacia de usar PayPal sobre otras plataformas de pago. Si tiene planes de comprar bitcoins, considere PayPal para una transacción segura ya que también obtiene protección para sus fondos. Hay muchas más ventajas intuitivas que obtienes al elegir PayPal para hacer una compra de cripto moneda. Posiblemente sea la mejor opción, ya que la mayoría de los mercados están integrando las opciones de pago de PayPal para satisfacer las diversas necesidades y requisitos de los usuarios.
After seeing its price double during a mind-boggling August, Ethereum lost $ 180 in a few days, a drop of more than 35%, should we be worried about that?
Technical Analysis – After seeing its price double during a mind-boggling August, Ethereum lost $ 180 in a matter of days, a drop of over 35%. Should we worry about it?
On September 1, Crypto Engine set its 2020 price record of the year reaching $ 490 before dropping rapidly to $ 310, during a descent as violent as its ascent.
While the correction that followed this record was sudden and abrupt, this type of correction remains normal in a bull market. All the cryptos have also recorded a difficult start to September, strongly correlated with the fall recorded by the US stock markets during this same period. For now, the trend remains medium term bullish for ETH.
If we look at the short-term behavior of ETH over the past week, we see that the price is in a bullish channel from its lows at $ 310. The price was recently thrown at $ 390 and, at the time of writing, ETH is trading at $ 372.
As long as the price remains above $ 360, the trend remains bullish in the short term . The next resistances are at $ 399 and $ 410.
A downward breakout of oblique support remains to be watched. The following brackets can be found at $ 360 and $ 310. A fall in the price to these levels would not yet call into question the medium-term uptrend.
An important price level to observe in the coming days is therefore the old ETH price record for 2019: the $ 360 zone . This level played a major supporting role throughout August. A maintenance of the price above this level is an important sign and would allow considering a further sharp rise in ETH.
The drop in the price of Ethereum will at least have made a few happy: the protocol users!
After hitting grotesque prices , Ethereum transaction fees have slipped dramatically, dropping nearly 75% from the September 2 highs. However, they are still 4 times more important than at the beginning of the summer and you will need today almost $ 1.60 to carry out a transaction on the network.
Bitcoin er vel den dominerende cryptocurrency i hele det digitale aktivum, men hvor meget af dets dominans er reelt?
Når Bitcoin placeres mod alle andre kryptoaktiver, ligger bitcoin’s dominans på cirka 60 procent. Imidlertid mener mange analytikere, at placering af det mod alle andre mønter eller mønter ikke er helt fair, og at det kun skal placeres mod valutaer, der prøver deres bedste for at være legitime penge eller som arbejder på at erstatte fiat. Indrømmet at dette er tilfældet, ville bitcoin’s dominans bevæge sig op til 80 procent.
Jordan Tuwiner – investoren i Real Bitcoin Dominance Index – antyder, at bitcoin’s markedsdominans skal bestemmes ved at placere det op mod alle andre cryptocurrencies, der er udvindt eller bygget fra bunden. En af de store ting, han foreslår at gøre for at finde frem til et korrekt forhold, er at smide alle valutaer ud, der blev til gennem oprindelige mønt tilbud (ICOs) eller gennem token salg. Dette ville automatisk diskvalificere populære stabile valutaer som Tether i betragtning af, hvor central det er.
Problemet med ICO’er er, at de styres centralt. Lad os sige, at en bitcoin-børs frigiver aktier lovligt gennem et token. Andre dominansindekser vil sandsynligvis medtage det i deres indeks. Hvis ja, hvorfor ikke medtage hele aktiemarkedet? ICO’er eller aktier, der er symboler, prøver ikke at være penge, og bør derfor ikke måles i et dominansindeks med bitcoin… Bitcoin konkurrerer som penge og ikke som en bestand eller et symbol. Stabile mønter, mens de er lettere at overføre end almindelig fiat i en bank, er stadig bare symboler, der støttes af fiat. Mønter, der ikke bruger et bevis på arbejde, kan udvindes eller ikke er knappe, da der ikke kræves noget reelt arbejde for at fremstille dem.
Ved Jordans analyse, skulle Ethereum imidlertid ikke være afskåret af al hensyn? Når alt kommer til alt skete ETH gennem et token-salg, men i dag er det den næststørste cryptocurrency efter markedsværdi og den primære konkurrent til bitcoin.
Ville dette udelukke Ethereum?
Tuwiner fortæller, at hans forskning banede vejen for at inkludere Ethereum af flere grunde, hvoraf den vigtigste var, hvor stor den er blevet. Han nævner:
Der er sandsynligvis hundreder, hvis ikke tusinder af mønter på de fleste dominansindekser, der er kunstigt oppustet … Ingen af de mønter, der er brugt i indekset, er forhåndsudviklet, udover Ethereum. Der var en debat om, hvorvidt Ethereum skulle inkluderes, men vi forlod det i sidste ende, da det er den næststørste mønt og bruges af mennesker som penge. Der er en mulighed for at slå den til eller fra, fordi kryptomiljøet er delt om, hvorvidt Ethereum kan fungere som penge.
Indrømmet Ethereum blev udelukket fra overvejelse, bitcoin’s markedsdominans ville i sidste ende have skudt op til mere end 90 procent i skrivende stund.